Bishop Mark Seitz of the Diocese of El Paso weighed in on Catholic voting and single-issue political methods in an analysis printed on America’s web site that’s certain to develop into really useful studying for voters of religion (“Bishop Seitz: Single-issue voting has corrupted Christian political witness”). He addresses society’s ills by the perspective of religion, not politics, and criticizes “single-issue political methods disconnected from an integral ethic of human life.”
“Catholics who want to take the calls for of our religion and social instructing significantly have lengthy had cause to really feel politically homeless at election time,” the bishop writes. “Neither social gathering and neither presidential candidate displays in a constant approach the ethic of affection and life expressed by Jesus within the Gospels.”
The article continues to generate suggestions from our viewers. The next in a sampling of on-line reader feedback, edited for size and readability.
This text must be required studying and dialogue in all Catholic parishes, colleges, schools and universities, non secular education schemes and seminaries. It must be analyzed for its capability for ethical reasoning, the best way to apply Catholic social doctrine to the injustices that prevail, and to know what goes into the mental formation of a bishop. Clearly, we want extra like Bishop Seitz. Single-issue voting is one more reason younger persons are leaving the church.
As a pro-choice American Catholic, relating to a girl’s proper to find out whether or not and the way she prevents being pregnant and whether or not she carries a being pregnant to time period, I simply wish to say this: Under no circumstances do I learn Bishop Seitz as having endorsed or supported or turned a blind eye to my place. He’s calling all Catholics, pro-choice Catholics included, to get up each morning to recall [their faith] not solely in thoughts however in follow. I, for one, am profoundly grateful for his belief that we’re succesful. He didn’t give anybody a go right here. He shared his religion and his hope.
It is a sensible article, naming most of the frustrations I confronted as a single-issue conservative voter for many years. The complexity of our present politics makes an ideal determination on this election unattainable. So we’re confronted with selecting the lesser of two evils, or pragmatically selecting our most popular purple or blue whereas holding our nostril, or possibly going third social gathering (but once more). However we’re referred to as, at each second, to do what love requires. This text will likely be a giant a part of my discernment for this election.
It is a very useful information as I battle with my vote this 12 months. I be aware that Bishop Seitz finally ends up saying that it’s my determination and never making a blanket assertion a few Catholic can’t vote for [fill in the blank] due to a single situation. This text is giving me some comfort and a course for my prayer as I strategy my vote when my mail-in poll comes. Could God grant us proper judgment and holy knowledge!
Thanks for a nuanced view of our political downside of single-issue voting. One side of stopping abortion that’s given little consideration is knowing why ladies search abortions. It’s a determination primarily based on each emotion and sensible issues. If we may discover a option to train about selecting correctly earlier than being pregnant happens, we’d be doing good on this planet. And such instructing could be much more delicate than “hold your legs collectively.” Within the meantime, we have to contemplate the welfare of our authorities once we vote on this election. We’re in a harmful place.
The problem of abortion is out of the arms of both the Democratic Celebration or Mr. Biden, ought to he be elected. The problem is within the arms of the Supreme Court docket. If the court docket decides to not overturn Roe v. Wade, the one option to change the legislation is by constitutional modification or by packing the Supreme Court docket with justices who, opposite to judicial ethics, have dedicated to a choice earlier than listening to the case.